astor

I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't put on 4OD actually, as it wasn't a show or anything, just a quick filler in the link. But I don't know.

How flat is his hair?

IF YOU PRAY THEN NO-ONE'S GONNA SAVE YOU

Oh we studied this, but I didn't listen

It's ok, I found the mark scheme buried online. Not cheating. Just resourceful.

(But I might need chemistry help later )

I HATE A LEVELS

Similaraties and differences between the structure of amino acids and nucleotides?

I think I'll just wake up, stay in bed, reach for the remote, turn on the tv, watch Mika, and go back to bed...

Well some of us don't have TVs in our rooms, you know.

IF YOURS EVEN WORKS WITHOUT YOU HAVING TO HOLD THE BUTTON DOWN

So staying up late tonight. And having to get up before 10 tomorrow.

(I make it sound like I'm being forced to watch this stuff )

I liked the one from Caroline Sullivan:a short but well-written review.

The other one is short... Well written? Hmm.

"During Mika's (g)imperial phase, around the time Sienna Miller was a style icon, one would sigh and say, 'I wish he'd dial it down' especially as he was singing that patronising song about plump girls. Be careful what you wish for. This comeback single is oddly subdued: Mika claims he wants 'the whole world to celebrate', but sounds like he just signed up for Dancing On Ice. Meanwhile, Pharell can barely be arsed to sound like himself."

That's because I assume it is different people who wrote those two reviews. it's not that the Guardian needs to align on what they think of an album - they simply publish those.

Ok that makes sense.

But he doesn't like Ticket To Ride? Biatch.

It's weird that The Guardian seem to have given it a favourable review, as the Guide - a supplement of The Guardian - said some less than flattering things about the new songs last week

Exactly!

 

 

 

It's much funnier with names, that's why I want to make the thread

Me too! Aaaaaw no Why didn't he sleep last night?

 

(if he needs help getting to sleep, he can just listen to this country music on radio 2 )

Exactly!

 

 

 

It's much funnier with names, that's why I want to make the thread

BUT THE AMAZING PERSONALITIES WE FILL IT WITH MAKE THE FUNNY.

They never used to have names...

BLAAAHAA

erf

Anybody any good at Chemistry? I thought I was ok, but I'm in a pickle!What is the difference between Mr and RAM (relative atomic mass)? I thought there wasn't any, but there seems to be one, and it relates to finding the molecular formula from the empirical formula, as well as other stuff. Also, I'm stuck on questions like this:

 

Nickel combines with carbon monoxide to form nickel carbonyl, Ni(CO)x ( x is subscript like in H2O). When 2.95g Nickel was heated with carbon monoxide,it was converted completely into 8.55g nickel carbonyl. Find the mass of CO which combined with 2.95g Ni and hence find the value of x in the formula.

 

I made a little equation:

 

2.95g+CO->8.55g

so CO=5.6g

 

And the Mr (arghh!) of CO is 12+16=28

Then I put it into the equation

 

no. of moles= mass/Mr

 

so then 5.6/28=x

but this is not going to be a nice integer value that would be the right answer and I cannot see where I went wrong. I had the same issue with the next question I tried, so I think the problem is with my method. Anybody know what to do?

Thanks for reading this. It's quite long.

As I understand it, Mr is the RAM(I guess this is the same as Ar?) of all the elements in the compound added together. So it basically means the same thing, but Mr is used when it is talking about compounds, and RAM is elements.

I assume you're doing AS level too as I am on this as well. I asked the teacher about the values being ridiculous and she said it isn't like GCSE when they all come to satisfactory numbers, it can be a bit random and you have to use 3 sig figs.

However I didn't check the question or your working, so can't say anything else. Sorry

He's amaaaaaaaaaaaazing. You're gonna love it.

Going to see him in Bristol in November!! SO EXCITED. Although I need to find someone to go with.

This is what I was trying to say yesterday. North Americans call that the 4th floor because there are 4 storeys between the actual physical ground and the roof. I really can't adjust to the concept that the ground floor is not the first floor. It's a floor and it's the first one so how can it not be the first floor?

Goodness knows. I have this problem every day trying to get to lessons.

12 octaves? Is that even possible?

No. It's not.

What's the message on the green ones?

If you like me back, try on my glasses

LOZZA facebook https://www.facebook.com/lozzaofficial

 

[MACHO CHIC POETRY designed by Mika]

 

/1. I hide my eyes from the sun, just so I can watch you better.

Okay whatever the original intention, this sounds more than a little creepy

Aha, that sounds a bit weird Maybe they meant that even though the elements are in the same periode they can be very very different

You're welcome, just glad someone asked something I could answer

Yes, that's probably right! AHH.

(Can you be my adoptive chemistry teacher? )

Finally something I know

 

If i understood the question right they are different because Na is in period three so it has three electron shells, but Ne is in period 2 so it has only two electron shell and are therefore smaller.

So

Ne periode 2 - 2 electron shells

Na periode 3 - 3 electron shells

 

the more electron shells you have the bigger the atomic radius is.

 

I hope that's the answer you want

That's the logical answer, and what my teacher said today, so thank you!

I was confused because I looked on some internet site and they said you can't really compare noble gases with non-metals or something But I don't know, you're right anyway, thank you