chartreuse

Oh sorry, I think there's been some confusion here: as far as I understand it, "Mica Penniman" hasn't added anybody. That one (if it's real) is his personal, private account for him and his friends only.

 

"Mika P" is the one who sent some add requests. That one is pretty obviously not him, or at least not a private personal profile. I'd say it's just something made by a fan, like there are profiles for fictional characters and dead celebrities. That one, people can try to add or message as they wish, since it's just for fun.

 

There is also a "Mika Penniman" profile, which is also obviously fake.

 

--Jack

oh. okay. still a bit confused.

hm...... i think i'm getting the accounts mixed up. I was referring to the account that added certain people only, because someone earlier said he had added/spoken to her, but someone else said he rejected her friend request, and that irked me because I thought he was using his "private" account to add fans he didn't know, yet only selected ones. but I think the account i'm referring to is one of the fakes, so it's all good now.

I think it's his real account because I was pointed towards it ages ago, and he had a different photo up then that was definitely not a fansite photo, and looked self-taken. (Kinda a Myspace angle shot, hehe. ) And anyway, why wouldn't he have one, if his sisters do?

 

But I don't think there's any favoring/ignoring going as se, and especially nothing we can possibly call "unprofessional," because this is his private account, having to do with Mica not Mika, and thus not having to do with his job, and thus not having to do with being professional. Maybe he was bored one day and decided on a whim to chat with whoever tried to add him, just 'cause. I mean, on my MySpace, I generally try to only add people I know, but once or twice I accepted add requests from random users because they seemed interesting and I felt like it, even if I denied add requests from other people the next day. Why should it be different here? Plus it's not like he added any fans. And anyway, as a private person, he is allowed to add or ignore whoever he likes onto his private profile.

 

It's like a bunch of fans showed up at his doorstep and asked to be invited for tea, and one day he thought "well this is funny," and came out and chatted with them, and on another day he thought, "no really, I just want to drink my tea in peace" and never answered the door, and people started to complain that he was being unfair and unprofessional.

 

--Jack

true. I just feel that if you're rejecting certain fans you're not personally acquainted with, yet adding others, and then calling it your "private" account.... just doesn't really balance out to me.

he didn't decide to chat with whomever added him; he took the initiative to add them. that's what i was talking about. i see your logic if he had logged on, saw the first comment on his page from some fan out there, and replied. but if you're interacting with someone on an artist-to-fan basis, i don't feel it's right to add certain people and acknowledge them but ignore/block your other fans.

the whole "mica/mika" thing doesn't make sense. I don't think just because the spelling is "mica" means that it's somehow a private account as opposed to "mika" unless he's specified only people close to him call him by that.

either way, I don't have facebook, ain't gettin' one, and wouldn't initiatively add him anyway. cause apparently it is supposed to be at least quasi-private.

is this all one big complex sexual metaphor or am I just in need of a cold shower?

whew! Lawd........

I love the Grateful Dead. and all psychedelic/sixties hippie music for that matter.

and I live just a little outside of San Fran.

bring on the sweet leaf!

I find this whole thing a little fluke-y. I doubt Mika would just pluck out certain fans to befriend and block others. Or have such ambiguous interactions with any of them over Facebook, especially for over an hour (he's one busy ass man). it doesn't seem very difficult to be an imposter on Facebook. All you need is a picture and a name.

but by the very slim chance that it is Mika, this leaves a bit of a bad taste in my mouth. favoring/acknowledging certain fans and ignoring others is pretty unprofessional, especially over the Internet... there's just something dislikable about this whole thing.

Should I send him a message on his official myspace account to ask him whether or not he has or will have a facebook account?

go ahead. don't expect a reply though...

not that i've seen this purported facebook page but i doubt he would go initiatively adding fans and then flirting with them for an hour using smilies (does he even have that kinda time on his hands?!) so s/he's probably an imposter.

ive got an idea, for the americans, i think it would be cute if mika was on the conan o'brian show, to talk and perform:biggrin2:

I think that'd be great exposure because o'brien usually invites the newer acts and it is a late night show after all.

personally, I just wanna see him on tv performing and being interviewed.

due to the timing of his rant, I'd say this has something to do with Somerset.

since we don't know what went down, I say we all just let this pass or wait it out, until some explanation or reaction from mika's side surfaces.

yeah....... i second that. the laugh ringtone would be great, the only way i know of is sending it. so I can PM you my #, thanks babes.

we shall wear flowers in our hair.

puff puff give.

make (hot, kinky) love (to mika), not war.

there we go.

huh. i guess i don't really hang around enough to notice recurring tensions or feuds......

but if it helps at all, everyone i've interacted with on here has been great, so let's all just bask in the peace, shall we? because frankly, it's a bit stupid to get all worked up over some petty disharmonies in what should just be a relaxing meeting place for mikaphiles.

someone in the comments posted:

"I bet mika rejected patrick when he came on to him after the show………"

Seems red is feeling a bit green.

Lots and lots of alcohol.

yeah and hummus, split-pea soup and vegan stuff (I guess he eats meat?) Oh well maybe I'll go out and get him some chicken.

Here's a charming pic of the two.

Okay okay let me clear this up for you all so there are no more uncertainties.........

Yes, Mika and I are married.

Yes I have heard of the MALE cleaning service's...they are often done NAKED arnt they:wink2: too late ppls I have him booked for LIFE now mwahahahhah

i'm willing to fight for him, damn it! :gun_bandana:

beer goggles?

where is it filmed??

and all i can say is THANK MOTHER TERESA it's about fu cking time he performed again on American television! this will be great exposure. if only I knew how to transfer the performance from VCR to youtube? I would totally put it up for you Brits, Aussies, etc.

Well Mika claimed in interviews that Perez would do the exact same thing he does with the others getting them out of the closet without permission or saying things about him the same way he would do for anybody if he was doing something to be said that way...

Apparently not

uhhh.... what? :roftl: that was confusing as hell..... you mean Perez would coerce him to come out anyway, with or without Mika's permission?

I dunno, they seem to be friends. I doubt Perez would go all Zac Efron on him seeing as they hang out..... how do you meet a "friend" for lunch and explain to him/her you just outed them on your viewed-by-millions website?

this is on Perez.

filed under "Gay Gay Gay."

Favorite Mika mannerism: Mika talking dirty:naughty:

WHAAAAT?! WHEN?! WHERE?! TELL ME.

uhhh what does a lazy eye have to do with piloting?