A swedish journalist wrote (mind my translation ):
Problemet är inte (vilket just nu tvingar demokrater att äta lugnande medel) att vicepresidentkandidatens prisvinnande sympatiska personlighet kan hjälpa republikanerna att vinna valet. Inte heller att hon har styrt Alaska på ett sätt som liknar något ur filmen ”Jägarna”, med vänskapskorruption och föga intresse för regler
The problem is not tha the candidate price winning persionality can help the republicans win the election. Neither that she has ruled alaska in a way that led to "friendly corruption" and her way of having too less interests in rules. no, the problems are that she skipped reading the american constitution before she went into a library and tried to forbid a book about homosexuality. That she for a few days ago said that Iraq has the responsibility for the terror attacs in new york seven years ago. That she says she can handle the conflicts between russia and georgia because "you can see russia from here" and recently hadn't travelled abroad, and very rarly from alaska. That she seems to not know anything when she is given the question of what she thinks about bush's mission of invading countries preventable. That she is going to solve the energy crsie by taking oil from alaska which will make the gosoline so cheap, so cheap.
Is there something the journalists speak? I've only followed palin's carrier from this little country far far away....