greta Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 love the twilight actors, loathe the saga...in fact I'm secretely go Brits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellody Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 have only read the first of the twilight novels so far, but i think i already can say that i definitely prefer potter. maybe not even because of the characters, i must admit that twilight is a brilliant idea as well... but stephanie mayer just doesn't have the genius of jk rowling, it's nice and funny to read and makes me want to know the rest of the story, yes... but all the suspense (over all the 7 parts) and dangers and secrets and mysteries and surprising twists and turns that make the potter books as fantastic as they are, are missing in twilight. i think stephanie mayer could've made much more of the original idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxxy Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Harry Potter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplegrape Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 HAPPY FREAKING POTTER!!! Tried to read Twilight but my distaste for bad writing and romances made me stop before I hardly got anywhere through it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alice.loves.mika Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 I prefer twilight at the moment; I've read all of them and seen the flick. With Harry Potter...I've read one of the books and watched 3 movies. I don't really find Harry Potter interesting. Twilight, however, I feel as though there is a certain depth to it that is not often explored. Plus I love a bit of romance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJohn Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 I'm sorry any Potter fans, but it just HAS to be Twilight I mean, face it, Robert is SOOOOOOO much nicer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplegrape Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 I'm sorry any Potter fans, but it just HAS to be Twilight I mean, face it, Robert is SOOOOOOO much nicer Sorry, couldn't help myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*carrie* Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 I finally read Twilight a few months ago. I still think Harry Potter's better. I'm sorry any Potter fans, but it just HAS to be Twilight I mean, face it, Robert is SOOOOOOO much nicer Yeah he was pretty good as Cedric Diggory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 I'm sorry any Potter fans, but it just HAS to be Twilight I mean, face it, Robert is SOOOOOOO much nicer what are we talking about? books, movies... ...grey undies...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitter.icarus Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 have only read the first of the twilight novels so far, but i think i already can say that i definitely prefer potter. maybe not even because of the characters, i must admit that twilight is a brilliant idea as well... but stephanie mayer just doesn't have the genius of jk rowling, it's nice and funny to read and makes me want to know the rest of the story, yes... but all the suspense (over all the 7 parts) and dangers and secrets and mysteries and surprising twists and turns that make the potter books as fantastic as they are, are missing in twilight. i think stephanie mayer could've made much more of the original idea. Agreed. I think there's no comparing Harry Potter. There so much DEPTH to it, so much emotion, humor, etc. That's just missing in Twilight. i wanted to see what other ppl's views about it were. wether or not i was the only potter fanatic lol Heh, you'll never be alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alice.loves.mika Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 I finally read Twilight a few months ago. I still think Harry Potter's better. Yeah he was pretty good as Cedric Diggory He was, actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loryx Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Twilight, of course *-* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2GSCPc/newsfeed.time.com/2010/06/29/5-reasons-we-love-harry-potter-more-than-twilight/ GO POTTahr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEP___ Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Team Potter. All the way. I grew up with the books, read them till they fell apart. Bought the english versions and improved my english by reading them over and over again. Nobdy can compete with HP! The way JK Rowling describes everything and I love the films aswell. You can feel the magic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikalollipop_karla Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 dunno both are good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*carrie* Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Harry Potter. The only reason I would consider seeing Eclipse is so that I can see the Harry Potter preview on the big screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilseh1983 Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Definitly Harry Potter:biggrin2: loved the books and the movies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikalollipop_karla Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 Definitly Harry Potter:biggrin2:loved the books and the movies the end is better in Harry Potter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*carrie* Posted June 29, 2010 Share Posted June 29, 2010 (edited) the end is better in Harry Potter Everything is better in Harry Potter I'm going to re-read the series again for like the 10th time before the movie comes out in November Edited June 29, 2010 by *carrie* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shikutukumimika Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Harry Potter has got Severus Snape. And Remus Lupin. Twilight doesn't have any really nice guys. So.. It's Potter for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roxy Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 You know, I've read them both, and I prefer Harry Potter, but I really don't see why everyone feels the need to compare them. I think they're totally different But I don't see the resemblance between Mika and Freddie Mercury either, so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*carrie* Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was published 13 years ago today. Happy birthday HP I can't believe it's been that long. I think this calls for a Harry Potter marathon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shine Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 Always Harry Potter. No hesitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shikutukumimika Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was published 13 years ago today. Happy birthday HP I can't believe it's been that long. I think this calls for a Harry Potter marathon That's so weird, I can totally remember reading it when it came out and being so proud for taking just under a year, but I would have been one year and 10 months old. I think I didn't read it right when it came out then. more likely 5 years later or so.\ Wait, of course the Dutch translation came out later. Edited June 30, 2010 by Shikutukumimika Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*carrie* Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 I found this on tumblr. Harry Potter is obviously better. Time's Five Reasons We Love Harry Potter More Than Twilight 1. A Better Universe Like George Lucas, JK Rowling is so great at creating worlds that it more than makes up for whatever flaws her writing suffers from. Think about all the wonderful things we know about Rowling’s wizarding world: Where they shop, what they eat, what kind of prejudices their societies have. Consider all the wonderful little side-characters she stacks the stories with: Neville Longbottom, Arthur Weasley, even Lee Jordan, the Quidditch announcer. We know them. By contrast, what do we know about the world of Twilight? Three things: Good vampires don’t bite people. Vampires and werewolves don’t like each other. Vampires like baseball. That is all. 2. Better Acting Let us examine the state of both franchises’ werewolves. The werewolf in Twilight is played by human action figure Taylor Lautner. Lautner is a undoubtedly a nice boy, but no one would disagree with the assertion that he is more famous for his workout regimen than anything he’s done on screen. The werewolf in Harry Potter is played by acclaimed British thespian David Thewlis. Have you even seen Thewlis’s gripping performance in Mike Leigh’s Naked, Twihards? No, of course, you haven’t. 3. Better Villains It might not be exactly fair to compare Harry Potter and Twilight on this issue; after all, Lord Voldemort is one of the greatest villains in recent pop-culture history. (He got the the Final Four in Techland’s super-scientific March Madness villains bracket.) Voldemort is a genocidal dictator who scares people so much they won’t even say his name. He wants immortality and will do anything (even drink unicorn blood!) to get it. He killed Harry’s parents — and tried to kill Harry —when our hero was just a defenseless little baby. Shoot, just writing this is making me glad he’s not real. But even without being compared to Voldemort, the bad guys in Twilight are weak. A villain played by Cam Gigandet (What is this, The OC?), Michael Sheen (Oh no, it’s Tony Blair!) or Bryce Dallas Howard (Come off it, I saw Lady in the Water) just isn’t scary enough for me. You could make the case that Bella’s inevitable aging is the real villain of Twilight, but come on! This isn’t Star Trek — invisible intangible villains aren’t going to cut it. 4. Healthier Attitudes Toward Sex Twilight is basically a supernatural version of Secret Life of the American Teenager: Everyone talks about sex all the time, and how BAD and HORRIBLE and AWFUL and WONDERFUL it would be. In Harry Potter, no one talks about sex at all. Having been weaned on Jane Austen adaptations, NewsFeed much prefers stuffy British repression over American teenage wangst. 5. It’s Lasted Longer The members of NewFeed’s generation have grown up with Harry Potter. We got Sorcerer’s Stone from the library in elementary school, waited in line for Order of the Phoenix in high school, dressed up for the Goblet of Fire movie with our freshman dorm in college. The years-long gap between films and movies filled us with anticipation. Each new release — as numerous trend pieces show — is an event. Twilight is much more ephemeral. The books have only been out since 2005, (which, if you’re counting, is when the second-to-last Potter book was released.) The films, rushed into production in case the trend dissipates, are even worse: the first movie came out barely a year and a half ago. There’s no waiting around, but there’s also no growing old with the characters. Twilight is undoubtedly a commercial entrprise — over $1 billion internationally for just the first two films — but it’s simply not a lasting cultural one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now