laura* Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Awwwww! The first photo is wonderful, thanks Greta! :wub2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 (edited) http://i26.tinypic.com/315eckw.jpg http://i27.tinypic.com/307s0hl_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/15wxdkx_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/2rz5hjm_th.jpg [/url]->AHAHAHAH JACKSPER! =D http://i27.tinypic.com/xgazyx_th.jpg http://i27.tinypic.com/5md1xz_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/ei3w9c_th.jpg http://i25.tinypic.com/fyj3ie_th.jpg http://i28.tinypic.com/2v92nfp_th.jpg you may now roll off your chairs for the lulz plus...I always loved Shakira but..get in the queue, gurl! Does Shakira Have A Crush On ‘Twilight’ Star Robert Pattinson? Do you want to see Shakira blush? Ask her about “Twilight.” Why would the vampire-and-werewolf film franchise get the superstar singer feeling a bit embarrassed? Is it because the title of her upcoming October album, She Wolf, shares a fondness for hirsute shape-shifters? Nope. Turns out Shakira has a little crush on “Twilight” star Robert Pattinson. “I love ‘Twilight,’ ” she told MTV News’ Tim Kash recently. “I can’t say what I love about “Twilight.’ ” " Does the first name begin with Robert and the second name end with Pattinson?" Kash wondered aloud. “No, no, no,” said the Colombian-born singer, bursting into laughter. “I’m too old. I can’t say those things.” Fighting off a case of the giggles, she added, “I mean, how old is he — 23? 24? … You are getting me in trouble!” For the record, RPattz doesn’t turn 24 until next May. And the 32-year-old Shakira didn’t fall for the man behind Edward Cullen until after she’d written and recorded the first single off the new album, also called “She Wolf.” “And then the president of my label said, ‘Have you checked out “Twilight”? It’s about wolves and vampires and things,’ ” she said. “And I’m like, ‘Ah, that’s up my alley. I mean, where is it?’ And I watched it and loved it.” But Shakira is a fan of all the big new fantasy movies and, if she had to pick, she’d side with Team Harry Potter over Team Edward. “I mean, ‘Harry Potter’ has been there for how many years?” she decided. “Pattinson just arrived.” That doesn’t mean she wouldn’t be interested in a little musical collaboration with RPattz, who plays guitar and piano and recorded vocals for two songs on the “Twilight” soundtrack. “I’ve heard he’s a great singer and a great musician,” she said. “If those rumors are true — yeah, of course, why not?” coz no! mwhaha rly, that'd be an interesting couple Edited July 24, 2009 by greta sh!t I can't write SH|T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 http://i26.tinypic.com/315eckw.jpg http://i27.tinypic.com/307s0hl_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/15wxdkx_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/2rz5hjm_th.jpg http://i29.tinypic.com/b4ydco_th.jpg ->AHAHAHAH JACKSPER! =D http://i27.tinypic.com/xgazyx_th.jpg http://i27.tinypic.com/5md1xz_th.jpg http://i26.tinypic.com/ei3w9c_th.jpg http://i25.tinypic.com/fyj3ie_th.jpg http://i28.tinypic.com/2v92nfp_th.jpg you may now roll off your chairs for the lulz plus...I always loved Shakira but..get in the queue, gurl! Does Shakira Have A Crush On ‘Twilight’ Star Robert Pattinson? Do you want to see Shakira blush? Ask her about “Twilight.” Why would the vampire-and-werewolf film franchise get the superstar singer feeling a bit embarrassed? Is it because the title of her upcoming October album, She Wolf, shares a fondness for hirsute shape-shifters? Nope. Turns out Shakira has a little crush on “Twilight” star Robert Pattinson. “I love ‘Twilight,’ ” she told MTV News’ Tim Kash recently. “I can’t say what I love about “Twilight.’ ” " Does the first name begin with Robert and the second name end with Pattinson?" Kash wondered aloud. “No, no, no,” said the Colombian-born singer, bursting into laughter. “I’m too old. I can’t say those things.” Fighting off a case of the giggles, she added, “I mean, how old is he — 23? 24? … You are getting me in trouble!” For the record, RPattz doesn’t turn 24 until next May. And the 32-year-old Shakira didn’t fall for the man behind Edward Cullen until after she’d written and recorded the first single off the new album, also called “She Wolf.” “And then the president of my label said, ‘Have you checked out “Twilight”? It’s about wolves and vampires and things,’ ” she said. “And I’m like, ‘Ah, that’s up my alley. I mean, where is it?’ And I watched it and loved it.” But Shakira is a fan of all the big new fantasy movies and, if she had to pick, she’d side with Team Harry Potter over Team Edward. “I mean, ‘Harry Potter’ has been there for how many years?” she decided. “Pattinson just arrived.” That doesn’t mean she wouldn’t be interested in a little musical collaboration with RPattz, who plays guitar and piano and recorded vocals for two songs on the “Twilight” soundtrack. “I’ve heard he’s a great singer and a great musician,” she said. “If those rumors are true — yeah, of course, why not?” coz no! mwhaha rly, that'd be an interesting couple :mf_lustslow: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fmbm Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 I love Ashely as Alice. I think she fits the look I had in my head perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adda Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 (edited) HELLO again Missed this thread A LOT. But for now I'm BACK!! [remember me?] You are brilliant folks!! HUGS & KISSES!!! OH! and I like Cullens' new looks. Mostly Alice. OH and Jasper Edited July 23, 2009 by adda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebAngel Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Hiii!!! Welcome back Adda!! Missed you!! Thank you Greta for the update!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adda Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Aww *blushes* THANK YOU GRETA INDEED *bows* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 (edited) Chris Weitz is a charming man robho is adorkable taycob is getting better after each view yay other moneymaker stuff http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyldfq0kQOc AHAHAH the ghassstly ghossst New Moon in Italy sneak peak {I suggest you to turn off the volume} http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_EUZWb9CZw&feature=player_embedded the NM score is gonna be good http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2009-7-23-comic-con-exclusive-bon-iver-thom-yorke-confirmed-for-new-moon Edited July 24, 2009 by greta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Thanks FP! *melts* :wub2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nico_collard Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Mmmmmmm... Taylor... Mmmmmmmm... Ashley... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Mmmmmmm... Taylor... Mmmmmmmm... Ashley... Hey! Welcome back, baby! The Twilight thread was waiting for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) why? WHYYY??? oooh 12 images I can post nooow! Edited July 28, 2009 by greta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilek Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 true blood? do any of you guys watch it? i watched first 3 episodes but didn't like it enough to keep watching:dunno: should i? tsk tsk Taycob! excuse my ignorance but are these spots on his face for the diamond effect? or he grew moles in Bella's absence? we're not gonna actually see them in the movie right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 excuse my ignorance but are these spots on his face for the diamond effect? or he grew moles in Bella's absence? we're not gonna actually see them in the movie right? Yep! the dots are there to be able to create the sparkling effect with digital technology in the final version. We won't see Rob's new moles in the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilek Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Yep! the dots are there to be able to create the sparkling effect with digital technology in the final version. We won't see Rob's new moles in the film. oh thank god! it looks quite funny i'm really curious for the new sparkling effect. Chris sounded very promising on comic-con. i hope there'll be some actual sparkling this time rather than just the ridiculous sound of it:teehee: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 oh thank god! it looks quite funny i'm really curious for the new sparkling effect. Chris sounded very promising on comic-con. i hope there'll be some actual sparkling this time rather than just the ridiculous sound of it:teehee: I'm trying to figure out how you can possibly shoot a sexy kissing scene with all those dots on his face. Ok, it's Rob, but still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilek Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I'm trying to figure out how you can possibly shoot a sexy kissing scene with all those dots on his face. Ok, it's Rob, but still... don't you close your eyes when you're kissing anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 don't you close your eyes when you're kissing anyway I would never close my eyes while kissing Rob, I would be afraid he might disappear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greta Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 @ laura shouldn't worry for things that may happen only in your head I personally find moles attractive @ dilek I've the same "distraction" for TB. I just don't get why the worse the better is the trend now anywayyy...why they replaced Rachelle for Victoria? Maybe the awesome gal herself found a better role? Or Kstew iz jealouuz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilek Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 (edited) i'm gonna miss Rachelle:tears: ''scheduling conflicts" my ass.i very much doubt it! and tweets off the day: person A:Rach was so excited to be in it & now she can't?Who's next? niki? person B:i think Nikki & Taylor are safe.They are obviously only replacing people who look exactly like their character description. person C: omg! Peter! Edited July 29, 2009 by dilek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura* Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Rachelle?! Gone?! She was perfect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna_Angel Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 why? WHYYY??? oooh 12 images I can post nooow! It is true that the Twilight saga is more light, but that does not mean it is the best,.... I love true blood, and the books are the best... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah_Lollipop Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 anywayyy...why they replaced Rachelle for Victoria? Maybe the awesome gal herself found a better role? Or Kstew iz jealouuz? I read that there were schedule clashes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebAngel Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 I read that there were schedule clashes. Yes, I was very surprised to read this......nothing prepared to it Specially she had been given more time in the NM movie than the book... ...and more were to come for her with Eclipse... Maybe she wants to take a break with the Saga ....and the fangirlz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilek Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 i knew it wasn't her desicion,they simply didn't want her for some reason:sneaky2: her statement: "I was stunned by Summit’s decision to recast the role of Victoria for ‘Eclipse,’” Rachelle said in a statement to Access Hollywood. On Tuesday, Summit announced that Bryce Dallas Howard would be taking on the role in “Eclipse,” due in May 2010. “I was fully committed to the ‘Twilight’ saga, and to the portrayal of Victoria,” Rachelle continued, explaining the turn of events that led to the casting change. “I turned down several other film opportunities and, in accordance with my contractual rights, accepted only roles that would involve very short shooting schedules. My commitment to ‘Barney’s Version’ is only ten days. Summit picked up my option for ‘Eclipse.’ Although the production schedule for ‘Eclipse’ is over three months long, Summit said they had a conflict during those ten days and would not accommodate me. Given the length of filming for ‘Eclipse,’ never did I fathom I would lose the role over a 10 day overlap. I was happy with my contract with Summit and was fully prepared to continue to honor it. Summit chose simply to recast the part.” The star concluded her statement with a regretful tone. “I am greatly saddened that I will not get to complete my portrayal of Victoria for the ‘Twilight’ audience. This is a story, a theatrical journey and a character that I truly love and about which I am very passionate. I will be forever grateful to the fan support and loyalty I’ve received since being cast for this role, and I am hurt deeply by Summit’s surprising decision to move on without me. I wish the cast and crew of ‘Eclipse’ only the very best,” she said. ----------------- seriously i didn't like the character in the book but i liked it in the movie just because of Rachelle.and what they did was very unfair and i don't like the new victoria,at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now