In a way i agree on this whole thing, and in a way i don't. Ofcourse i don't think Mika is lying about being sick and he needs to take it easy for sure! I really think that it's too much to sue him, but i understand if they're a little pissed off because this is kinda confusing that he is able to play some shows and some don't. It he's got pneumonia i don't think he shouldn't be playing any shows at all at this point.
They definitely deserve a proof for this...but i think that suing Mika it's way over the top. But it's only right that they get a proof, because Mika not being there must have been a huge disappointment.
Ofcourse i'm not blaming Mika for any of this, but it's just a little confusing. I was planning on going to Roskilde only to see Mika this year but decided not to but if i'd gone and he'd have canceled because of pneumonia and then played another gig one or two days later i'd probably be just a tiny little disappointed. It's kinda obvious that somebody is lying.
If they sue him i'll definitely be mad at them!...but i still think they should get that proof. And again, no hard feelings on Mika, i'll always love him.