Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ID3. It was all a joke :wink2: Sorry for the confusion.

EDIT: And then I read yours wrong too :roftl:

Too conservative?? You have me outdone with that comment :naughty:

Edited by Kelzy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 373
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Teegs ... that means alot , cant wait for my huggle

 

 

 

LMAO

 

That's okay!

 

 

But just for you, you'll get something extra special... *gropes* :das:

 

I don't see anything wrong with what she said... She has some good points there. I agree with her, but as I can't guarantee that it's truth, and no one can, it's not worthy speculating any further about it... I don't intend to stick my nose in his love life, relationships, etc.

She might be wrong, she might be right... But we can't be sure of anything:wink2:

 

I figure there's nothing better to do at the moment than speculate :naughty:...

 

 

Seriously though, if there are people who know if Meeks has a special someone, then I'm pretty sure they're not about to go around the forum saying it... It's really not much of our business, but as I said, there are heaps of people who would just like to know he has someone and would like to tell him that we're glad he has someone...

 

Why would you tell us you know it if you're not going to tell us?

 

Might as well not say anything at all, it's like a fat kid at the end of a a chocolate conveyor bel being slapped each time he reaches for a piece.

 

*imagines fat kid being slapped when he reaches for chocolate by mzee*

 

He's Mika or Meeks to me,no Big M,Sire or anything else :naughty::roftl:

 

He's Mika or Meeks to me too...

 

 

I like Meeks... it sounds cool...

 

 

And I wouldn't want to make him even more full of himself by calling him Sire or Big M... I'm not really into feeding his ego :naughty:... He's good enough to do that himself! :bleh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not here to feed you with chocolate conveyor bel,but I do have some link which means A LOT to me

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/apr/28/popandrock.features

 

It's not about him BEING with someone though,we can get that information from the LA fans.

 

PS: Includes his interpretation of SITM.

 

What's new about that? That article is from 2007, and doesn't contain any new information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's new about that? That article is from 2007, and doesn't contain any new information.

 

Yes and I wouldn't read too much into the term "sexuality" either. Whether someone is gay, straight, bisexual, etc. refers to their sexual orientation. A person's "sexuality" is a far broader subject and it's a new concept/experience we all are faced with as we are transitioning from childhood to adulthood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and I wouldn't read too much into the term "sexuality" either. Whether someone is gay, straight, bisexual, etc. refers to their sexual orientation. A person's "sexuality" is a far broader subject and it's a new concept/experience we all are faced with as we are transitioning from childhood to adulthood.

Exactly. So many people who swore they were straight as a teenager may end up having a bisexual experience, then question their orientation, head one way, then further down the track swing back the other way.

I don't believe sexuality is set in stone for everyone. All that article tells me is that Mika is perfectly normal in this regard and questioned something we have all questioned - as Christine has just said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and I wouldn't read too much into the term "sexuality" either. Whether someone is gay, straight, bisexual, etc. refers to their sexual orientation. A person's "sexuality" is a far broader subject and it's a new concept/experience we all are faced with as we are transitioning from childhood to adulthood.

 

Exactly. Couldn't have said it better myself.:thumb_yello:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. So many people who swore they were straight as a teenager may end up having a bisexual experience, then question their orientation, head one way, then further down the track swing back the other way.

I don't believe sexuality is set in stone for everyone. All that article tells me is that Mika is perfectly normal in this regard and questioned something we have all questioned - as Christine has just said.

 

No, no, that's not what I meant. :naughty:

 

Although I do agree with what you said. :thumb_yello:

 

What I mean is that the term sexuality is not synonymous with sexual orientation. I think people confuse the two and often use "sexuality" when they really mean sexual orientation.

 

When you are 5 years old you are hopefully not much of a sexual being. This state begins to change as you enter puberty and sexuality becomes a huge part of your life, perhaps even a driving force behind a lot of your behaviour and decisions, especially as you become sexually active.

 

Sexual orientation is only a part of that and for some people it's not an issue at all. I mean I personally have never given much thought to my sexual orientation. It's been clear to me and unwavering since before I was even consciously aware of human sexuality.

 

But we are all impacted greatly (I would think) by discovering a new state of sexuality as we start to transition to adulthood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no, that's not what I meant. :naughty:

 

Although I do agree with what you said. :thumb_yello:

 

What I mean is that the term sexuality is not synonymous with sexual orientation. I think people confuse the two and often use "sexuality" when they really mean sexual orientation.

 

When you are 5 years old you are hopefully not much of a sexual being. This state begins to change as you enter puberty and sexuality becomes a huge part of your life, perhaps even a driving force behind a lot of your behaviour and decisions, especially as you become sexually active.

 

Sexual orientation is only a part of that and for some people it's not an issue at all. I mean I personally have never given much thought to my sexual orientation. It's been clear to me and unwavering since before I was even consciously aware of human sexuality.

 

But we are all impacted greatly (I would think) by discovering a new state of sexuality as we start to transition to adulthood.

I'm confused, but better for it. :roftl: I couldn't explain it again myself though. Thank you. :naughty: *bookmarks page*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's new about that? That article is from 2007, and doesn't contain any new information.

 

It does contain SITM interpretation,I have never read that one before and I found it pretty interesting and thought of maybe sharing it with you.

 

 

Yes and I wouldn't read too much into the term "sexuality" either. Whether someone is gay, straight, bisexual, etc. refers to their sexual orientation. A person's "sexuality" is a far broader subject and it's a new concept/experience we all are faced with as we are transitioning from childhood to adulthood.

 

I agree with you,but I didn't say it was about his sexuality,did I? :wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had heard it and it's what many of us think, me included.

 

Was that reffering to me? If yes,then okay,sorry I didn't know you already knew that,but actually I was about to send you a PM with that interview,the part where he talks about SITM actually :roftl::wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was that reffering to me? If yes,then okay,sorry I didn't know you already knew that,but actually I was about to send you a PM with that interview,the part where he talks about SITM actually :roftl::wink2:

 

it was in reply to your post, yes, and no need whatsoever to be sorry, it was not a complaint. :bleh: I just wanted to say I had heard it and read that interview in specific either, a while back.

 

hehe thanks for the kind thought of sending me the link cause of SITM..:wub2: I do appreciate it :blush-anim-cl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was in reply to your post, yes, and no need whatsoever to be sorry, it was not a complaint. :bleh: I just wanted to say I had heard it and read that interview in specific either, a while back.

 

hehe thanks for the kind thought of sending me the link cause of SITM..:wub2: I do appreciate it :blush-anim-cl:

 

Oh okay then. It's just,I've never read it before and so did some more people on here...and I love this interview :wink2:

 

You're welcome :wub2: anytime :thumb_yello:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's okay!

 

 

But just for you, you'll get something extra special... *gropes* :das:

 

 

 

I figure there's nothing better to do at the moment than speculate :naughty:...

 

 

Seriously though, if there are people who know if Meeks has a special someone, then I'm pretty sure they're not about to go around the forum saying it... It's really not much of our business, but as I said, there are heaps of people who would just like to know he has someone and would like to tell him that we're glad he has someone...

 

 

 

*imagines fat kid being slapped when he reaches for chocolate by mzee*

 

 

 

He's Mika or Meeks to me too...

 

 

I like Meeks... it sounds cool...

 

 

And I wouldn't want to make him even more full of himself by calling him Sire or Big M... I'm not really into feeding his ego :naughty:... He's good enough to do that himself! :bleh:

 

Of course, I agree and I'm one of those persons aswell...:wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/apr/28/popandrock.features

 

i just read that.. i didn't know mika ever had anything to do with simon cowell? someone care to elaborate, please?

 

He's mentioned that about million times I think :naughty: when he was young Mika has sent him his demos but Simon told him he had a good voice,but that the songs are crap. Then Mika wrote Grace Kelly,like some kind of a rebel and F*ck off song.. :naughty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's mentioned that about million times I think :naughty: when he was young Mika has sent him his demos but Simon told him he had a good voice,but that the songs are crap. Then Mika wrote Grace Kelly,like some kind of a rebel and F*ck off song.. :naughty:

 

the only thing i'd ever heard mika say about simon cowell is that "I certainly DID NOT write grace kelly about simon cowell.." :blink: maybe i'm just ignorant :roftl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks. so what were the other things about simon cowell? did mika actually audition for idol, or something like that?

 

No. He had some little meeting with him or something in his office when he was a teen and Simon Cowell told him that his voice was very distinctive, but that his songwriting wasn't very good, but as he was telling him that, he noticed a Teletubbies thing on the wall behind him and yeah, he didn't take the criticism to heart :naughty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. He had some little meeting with him or something in his office when he was a teen and Simon Cowell told him that his voice was very distinctive, but that his songwriting wasn't very good, but as he was telling him that, he noticed a Teletubbies thing on the wall behind him and yeah, he didn't take the criticism to heart :naughty:

 

oh really? lol. teletubbies? interesting. i think i believe most of that. *goes to research*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy